Which is better stiga or butterfly

Unlike its rival, the Butterfly can fit experienced players finding a better tool to improve their level. Having such credibility alone proves the quality and popularity of this model. How to select a Table Tennis Racket? Each sample aims at customers with different levels, making it hard to give out the most accurate answer. However, from the perspective of an experienced player, the Butterfly is our winner today. This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible.

Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful. Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings. If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy. Privacy Overview This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Strictly Necessary Cookies Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

Rubber quality affects a lot on the spin feature of any paddle-like Stiga Evolution vs Butterfly Stiga Evolution has premium rubber which allows good speed and reasonable spin while maintaining excellent control thanks to a plethora of microscopic air bubbles. Stiga Evolution has a lightweight handle with a hollow inside so that players can maintain the control performance.

To enhance your experience and practice in offensive playstyle, you should consider this Stiga Evolution. I hope this comparison between Butterfly Vs Stiga Evolution will help you make the final decision.

However, each product has a design suitable for each player. Stiga Vs Butterfly blades. Post Reply Author Message. Members Profile. Post Reply. Of course, the problem is The other problem is You can take any brand The other brands and most of all I have tried all these blades and my personal thought is that they only compete regarding Some of these blades are not well made, the weight differences between 2 blades samples received or blades bought can really be huge and I have personnaly never find one better than BTY.

Regarding the rubbers Butterfly seems to win it by KO. When we are looking world tour tournaments or German, French Have you seen a pro player somewhere really using : emerald, carbonado, cc7, ebenholz, rosewood?

Butterfly rules with nittaku in blades. No one can say something different. Personally, I have the emerald but also the rosewood from stiga. Between these years that I play I have bought many brands and in stiga too, but I have sold them back. Butterfly and nittaku are the best blades ever made.

In rubbers there is only one brand, Butterfly. Stiga, unfortunately wanted to make the big difference starting with ebenholdz and rosewood series, wich are the same poor construction as the oldest blades I have personal experience to say that and then stiga tried to convince us with the emerald and then carbonado series. Both poor constructed again.

No sealing on the top plies and I think that the glue that is used for the plies to be applied, is not good quality. The only good in emerald is that it is very good blade to play with and it is very beautiful to watch. If u try to peel off the rubbers, the problems are starting.

Ofc there are exceptions, but the most of the people have the same problem. Butterfly has to rethink the parameter price, but stiga has nothing to think I am not spending money for these poor made blades of stiga I prefer to put some euros more and buy an excellent-quality Butterfly blade! Ebenholz V is used by some china women national members cant remember names at the moment Rosewood V used by Wang Liquin. Chinese national team do not really have a choise.

Stiga is in cooperation with CNT for as long as 10 years. I agree to nearly all points, but with some acceptions. Like I already wrote somewhere on MyTT, Stiga was the best blade-producer in the 60's up to the 80's without a really competitor until After years as number one the quality got worse and also the playing-skills. You can feel the difference, if you compare an old Stiga Allround Wood from with the actual Allround Classic or the old Offensiv Classic black double lens with the actual Offensiv Classic.

The Emerald also looks extremely good. Personally I bought three Emerald and still have two of them. All three blades had high quality and no problems after dozens of rubber-removings.