Sic what does

Sic in square brackets is an editing term used with quotations or excerpts. It is used to point out a grammatical error, misspelling, misstatement of fact, or, as above, the unconventional spelling of a name.

Another common Latin expression you might come across is sic transit gloria mundi. Neither does our president. I love you. In other contexts, though, you might seek an alternative to using [sic].

Another common situation where you might use quotations is in testimonials from customers or clients. Also, of course, if you are going to use [sic] when quoting someone or sharing an excerpt of a piece of writing, do be very careful that you have the correct facts or correct spelling. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! We use this quite a bit when working on academic papers.

Often, the client will be quoting a source that has a grammatical or spelling problem. Hey Eric…I thought the same thing. Oh, really. Good to know. For some reason, I thought the same thing as Eric and Jeff. I even took Latin for 4 years in high school, I should have known better…. I guess I never thought about that one. Then I got the brilliant idea to google it! Thanks people. I had always assumed it was an acronym as well. With whoever is writing the article adding in things like [T]his and [A.

Nonymous, ] into the quote make it more readable. Thank you for this…I have been seeing this a lot on the web lately and wondered what it meant. Nice post! Reading a news article about an interview with Dick Cheney brought me here. I, too, see that used in articles but have no idea what it means. To CC, ad hoc is a networking term where you share a network connection from one network adapter to another network adapter on the same computer.

Common applications of this are to have a desktop that is near a modem that is receiving a wired internet signal that it can then share through a wireless adapter to other computers around a household.. But if you read it in an article, I guess it might have another meaning.. Advertisement If the article or the existing discussions do not address a thought or question you have on the subject, please use the "Comment" box at the bottom of this page.

It would certainly be proper to put [sic] after each quoted error. If the error is not within a quote, you may just correct it entirely in your draft or at least after the first notification of an error in the original. With all due respect you seem rather clueless about the many uses of sic. To ignore the very important ironic use and off the top of my head three other usages then imply CMOS supports you strikes me as.

Example: Learn and unlimit sic yourself. Is writing sic over here correct? Intentionally making a new word and writing sic after that is okay? Although it is an uncommon practice, sometimes [ sic ] is used to indicate ironic use of a word. Brackets, not parentheses, should be used, and there should be a space before [ sic ]. I am in complete agreement with your comment that corrects this common agreement error! While many people working from the descriptive rather than prescriptive end of the conventions dichotomy have simply switched to using plural pronouns in general examples, as Catherine S.

Rather than resorting to this exceptional error, writers can instead utilize both plural antecedents and pronouns in their general examples. Thank you for your comment. For a more extensive examination of this particular topic, you might be interested in reading our posts How Can They Be Singular?

If you have a long quote [sic] must be used on every occasion that the emblem of a blemish in the use of language is needed. How do you correct the error. Would it be appropriate as follows: [sic correction]?

Do you italicize sic and the corrected word or just sic? Thank you. You do not actually correct the error. You leave the incorrect word and only italicize and put sic in brackets. In formal writing [ sic ] alone is preferred. However, informally, you could use your method. That is interesting. Wikipedia does, however, define the word and acknowledge its use, especially in the field of palaeography the study of ancient writing. Your usage is incomplete. Following unquoted text, authors uncommonly may insert sic to indicate ironic use.

Quoted or not, sic is used to indicate a surprising or paradoxical word, phrase, or fact that is not a mistake and is to be read as it stands. We tend to favor The Chicago Manual of Style and The AP Stylebook , commonly referenced by writers, which emphasize using sic for misspellings, errors, or peculiar usages. I have inserted the sic, but am confused as to the exclamatory punctuation of the quoted statement. Should there be a space between the closing bracket and the exclamation mark?

Actually I find this word to be a weapon used to correct the ignorant. Now, I understand how the defendant eight [sic] me for lunch at the end but, I believe I still have a Continuing Violation. I even got the attention of an appeals judge for six months [sic], three months because I motioned the court for a continuation due to an emergency and, it was not only granted but the requested documents went from 10 to 5, but was still foreign to me.

But Winston Churchill put it best, someone who represents themselves in a court of law, has a fool for a client… Thanks, I am better prepared for the next go round……. Either a question mark or exclamation point could be acceptable.

The Chicago Manual of Style says: 6. Use [ sic ] to indicate that something incorrectly written is intentionally being left as it was in the original.

However, it would be clearer to write [sic] in roman if the text is italicized. For example: Gone Width [sic] the Wind. Not trying to be a Nazi, but a homonym is a word that shares the spelling while a homophone is a word that shares the sound.

I get them mixed up all the time so I thought I might post this for the benefit of those like me who may confuse the two. The word homonym is often used, as we did in our blog, to refer to words that are either homographs or homophones. In common parlance, then, words that sound alike, look alike, or both, can be called homonyms. Sic is usually italicized and placed right after the error.

If the word a is an error, it should go after a. Your use of [ sic ] could be correct. It is impossible to guess exactly how the phrase was used without seeing it in context. I am quoting a passage with an error which is that the author has attempted to use a pair of parenthetic commas but done so incorrectly.

The result is two commas in the wrong place. Where should [sic] go? While commonly placed following a misspelled or wrongly used word in an original document or passage, we have never seen [ sic ] used to indicate punctuation errors.

We fear that wherever you place it, readers will assume that the word immediately preceding [ sic ] is somehow in error. If the passage you wish to quote sufficiently conveys the message you are needing, we would just leave it alone.

If you feel it is necessary to point out the incorrect commas, you might try an explanation within brackets, e. For instance:. Obviously there is no error, but in the same vein, alerting the reader to an additional contextual piece of information which is vital to the communication. As discussed in our Rule 1 of Brackets , brackets can be used to explain or comment on a quotation. If there is an incorrect citation to a section number, e. If a sentence is unnecessarily capitalized in a quotation, should [sic] be placed afterwards in that situation, as well?

While commonly placed following a misspelled or wrongly used word in an original document or passage, we have never seen [ sic ] used to indicate capitalization errors. It is possible that wherever you place it, readers will assume that the word immediately preceding [ sic ] is spelled incorrectly. This common ignorance has caused very many Fitz-es to give up trying to retain the correct capitalization of their surnames, increasing the ignorance and depressing the correct usage.

You should use [ sic ] following a word that is misspelled or wrongly used in the original. What about the use of [sic] as an indication of irony amongst others things as stated above by Charles. Do you have examples? As mentioned in January , such other uses are uncommon. You may wish to look at the discussion in Wikipedia, Sic, especially sections 2.

I often must include large pertinent sections from contracts in the briefs I type. I am writing a piece using UK english but quoting a lot of American writers — should I keep the American spelling in the quote and put [sic] after each word that uses the American spelling? Since [ sic ] is usually used to indicate something that is incorrectly written, and the spelling in the quotes is not incorrectly written in American English, we do not recommend using [ sic ].

You may want to mention in your article that American spellings may differ from those used in UK English. The term [sic] indicates that something contains an error in the language it was written in. Thank you for your clever uses of [ sic ]. We did intend to use the name Ananda , a name more often found in India. Ananda: [ah-nun-duh] Male cousin and personal assistant of Buddha. His recollections make most of the Tripitaka Three baskets — the Buddhist gospel.

Thank you,. Is this common? And should I put the [sic] into the above quote in my own writing? I can see both sides of the argument here…. We do not consider this use of [ sic ] common. We think this is a bit pretentious and that the quoted material should stand on its own. Do the wise editors have any advice? The wise editors agree. Fred says: October 22, , at pm I have seen some texts use [sic] when quoting politically incorrect quotes, such as:. We do agree that, in the particular example you note, using they might confuse some readers about whether just the teacher is being referred to or both the child and the teacher.

A better method in such cases may be to rewrite: Teachers wanting to set children extra homework would need the permission of the principal. I have been told not to make any corrections or additions, except for the use of [sic]. It is strange that you have been told not to make any corrections or additions.

If the text the error is in is already italicised, do you unitalicise the [sic] or leave it italicised? It would be clearer to write [ sic ] in roman if the text is italicized. Does Chuck do the work himself? If the reporter would have written a newspaper account of that interview, would [sic] have been appropriate to indicate each of those twenty, or has our society changed to a point where such grammar has become acceptable and somewhat the norm? Or does it evolve from Latin?

My iPod frequently corrects incorrect intentions or slang. Normally, the word sic is used to indicate an error. Sic is italicized, surrounded by brackets, placed immediately following the error, and no other word is used in the brackets. We recommend proofreading messages before sending.

So is it correct usage to put [sic] after the word likely to indicate that the bold type is what the original author deliberately intended? While commonly placed following a misspelled or wrongly used word in an original document or passage, sic is not generally used to indicate punctuation or typeface errors. It is standard to indicate whether bold or italics in a quote were either included in the original text or added later to emphasise a particular point. How do I indicate I have added italics to emphasise words within a quote?

Bob asked specifically about using the term sic. The rules you cited apply to clarification of italics. I format legal documents at a law firm. Opposing firms send discovery to us for our clients to answer. To prepare these documents, I scan to convert them into our system and format using Styles in Word to create a document that mimics or looks exactly like the one that was sent to use from opposing counsel. Styles seems to be an under-used skill by many secretaries … I come across a lot of numbering errors.

My question is this: I use sic throughout the documents that I format as needed per spelling errors or grammatical errors, but how would I properly indicate an error in numbering since there is an automatic half-inch space between the number and the first word of the sentence in styles? I use Styles and iHyperstyles when formatting. We suggest that you consult a style guide that specializes in legal documents. Your question was received on February 6, and a response was posted on February We issue a newsletter to over 42, subscribers each week and receive about 35, different visitors to our website each day, several of whom submit questions to us, which we answer to the best of our abilities.

We deeply apologize. I read through the entire thread very patiently, and it is simply brilliant. Thank you! I am sic[k] with happiness! You have totally clarified all my doubts I had, and now I can confidently yews [sic] whenever required! I just saw a paragraph that had number of errors in it. Instead of putting sic after every word, they just put it in front of the whole paragraph.

Am I correct in assuming this is incorrect? Thank you for this. It was a very straight-forward explanation — exactly what I was looking for. How do I acknowledge sensational spelling or intentionally misspelled brand names in formal writing?

It may seem obvious for the well-known brands, but how would I let the reader know that that is actually the correct spelling for lesser known name brands? Most readers probably recognize the names of the brands you identified and realize the misspelling is intentional.

If you feel it is necessary to point out the intentional misspelling of the names, just say so in parentheses in as few words as possible. It almost certainly will be and then adding the circled-R trademark sign immediately after the term should indicate that the creative spelling is the result of deliberate effort on the part of a marketing or branding department somewhere. Various dictionaries list both sicced and sicked as acceptable spellings for the past tense of sic.

Therefore, writing [ sic ] is not necessary. I am typing up an audio transcript in which the speaker incorrectly uses the word linguistics when she means logistics. Would sic apply in this case? Does it apply when transcribing spoken word vs written? I know from your many responses and explanations that [sic] is to be used after each error, but when quoting someone where there are multiple errors within a short quote it raises the issue of shaming the quoted.

A singular [sic] after the final quote feels discreet and unambiguous when the errors are obvious. This is a real-world example someone else used in an email I received, and I admit I liked the usage because it was obviously literally quoted, but did not unnecessarily repeatedly shame:. I hope this will elevate your concerns. The use of a single [ sic ] at the end might not give enough information to the reader of the quote regarding the errors.

If you are opposed to using [ sic ] after each error, other options include silent correction or making the corrections in square brackets, e. We agree with recent direction from the Chicago Manual of Style that outside an academic setting, [ sic ] may be viewed as impolite or condescending. It is all right to use sic for factual errors, but unless the error is obviously wrong, as in this case: When the Civil War started in [sic], few believed it would last long, you may be causing unneeded confusion.

The actual number was No, we do not recommend using [ sic ]. Please see our replies of August 25, , to Dara and July 7, , to zar. British or perhaps Commonwealth English.

Is there anything wrong with just underlining the misspelled words? We do not recommend underlining. If you think using [ sic ] is too intrusive, you might try an explanation in the preface or introduction of the book. If I am quoting a document directly, and I insert a well-placed [sic], is there anything I should state at the end of the quotation, to indicate that the [sic] was inserted by me and that it is not included in the original document? Use of [ sic ] implies that it is not included in the original document.

It is not necessary to add a note to the end of the quotation. That does sound unusual, but possible. We recommend writing the quote exactly as it was originally written. If you feel it is necessary to point out that [ sic ] is part of the original quote, you could add an explanation, e. I can give an example. Would your citation look like:. Are there multiple meanings of sic or multiple uses for [sic]? If we do know how to use [sic] , some might even argue that using it can make us look a little pompous.

Or they might laugh off its use as unnecessary or extraneous. Check out these comments about [sic] , published by The Guardian. According to the Merriam-Webster 11 th Collegiate Dictionary, [sic] as an adverb is defined as intentionally so written — used after a printed word or passage to indicate that it is intended exactly as printed or to indicate that it exactly reproduces an original.

As a verb, it means chase or attack , or to incite or urge to an attack, pursuit, or harassment. In yet its third form it is a Scottish variant of such.

Most often we see [sic] used in quoted text, next to a typo or mistake made by an original author. People also use sic as a verb, especially when encouraging a dog to attack. Journalists often use [sic] when quoting text from other stories or resources that have typos in them. Also, [sic] should be used when writing academic papers and quoting text from original documents.

Typos and grammatical errors are especially important to identify in academic writing when such typos or errors call into question the integrity or meaning of certain research findings or conclusions.